Moving on to Patterson's cross examination

Katy WatsonAustralia correspondent Erin Patterson has accused the prosecution of an “unfair and oppressive” cross-examination that constitutes a miscarriage of justice. Being cross-examined in court isn’t supposed to be easy – the aim is to undermine the other side’s case, to find holes in their argument. And for five days, that’s what barrister Nanette Rogers did. Erin Patterson fielded endless questions, with Rogers accusing her of lying repeatedly, and at one point suggestion she had “two fac