Cross-examination of Patterson was 'fair' and 'strongly justified', court hears

Crown prosecutor Jeremy McWilliams now deals with ground five of the defence's appeal - that the prosecution's cross-examination of Patterson was "unfair and oppressive". He says the claim is "thoroughly without substance" as the way Patterson was questioned in court was "careful, thorough, fair and professional". Patterson's lawyers have said the questions put to her during the trial were repetitive and cherry picked evidence of other witnesses, but McWilliams says