Questioning of Patterson was too long and unfair

Barrister Richard Edney argues that the prosecutor's framing of her questions, the repetitive nature of them, and the length of the cross examination were all unfair. "The applicant’s cross-examination was doused with impermissible conduct and was unnecessarily protracted," he claims. For example, Patterson was repeatedly asked whether other witnesses were wrong, which may have led the jury to think why Patterson couldn't explain why she claimed they were wrong. And there were other wa